[Sparkle] LaunchPad + Bazaar vs. Lighthouse + Git[Hub]

[Christopher Bailey]

That is true, but I guess to play Devil's Advocate, I would guess that the
vast majority of Sparkle user's don't even interact with the source control
system usually.  They download a release and so on.  Or, the next step might
simply pull down the HEAD version, and it's pretty easy to tell them to do
"git clone http://..." instead of "svn export ..." etc.  For the few who
actually do dev work on it, I'd guess it would really be their call as to
what will help them best continue the development of Sparkle.  If it were
me, I'd be making that same move, as it will dramatically enhance
productivity, features, and so on.

On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Seth Willits <seth at freaksw.com> wrote:

>
> Subversion is so widespread now (and built-in too!), switching to
> something else would be pretty annoying to those who would have to install
> and learn some other system. It's hard enough getting people to understand
> one system. :-\
>
>
> --
> Seth Willits
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sparkle mailing list
> Sparkle at lists.andymatuschak.org
> http://lists.andymatuschak.org/listinfo.cgi/sparkle-andymatuschak.org
>



-- 
Christopher Bailey
Cobalt Edge LLC
http://cobaltedge.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.andymatuschak.org/pipermail/sparkle-andymatuschak.org/attachments/20080507/2c01066d/attachment.htm>