[Sparkle] Avoiding an incompatible update

[Andy Matuschak]

Okay, true. It got added sometime between 1.1 and now. You'll have to  
do the multiple feed thing, I'm afraid.

- Andy Matuschak

On Jan 20, 2008, at 8:19 PM, David Dunham wrote:

> On 20 Jan 2008, at 19:38, Andy Matuschak wrote:
>
>> Whoa, whoa, it's way simpler than all this: there's a
>> sparkle:minimumSystemVersion element supported in trunk. I don't  
>> think
>> it's documented, but just put the minimum system version for the
>> version in question as the value of that element as a child of the  
>> RSS
>> item.
>
>
> But I distribute released versions. When did this get added? Sure
> doesn't seem to be in 1.1.
>
> So I'd still need to update my Tiger users separately, even if I was
> working from the head of SVN.
>
> David Dunham     A Sharp, LLC
> Voice/Fax: 206 783 7404     http://a-sharp.com
> "People seem to misinterpret complexity as sophistication" -- Niklaus
> Wirth
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sparkle mailing list
> Sparkle at lists.andymatuschak.org
> http://lists.andymatuschak.org/listinfo.cgi/sparkle-andymatuschak.org