[Sparkle] Quiet mode?

[Andy Matuschak]

Rob's got the idea of what needs to happen: every action Sparkle wants  
to take in talking to the user should be potentially delegated through  
some updater:willDoSomething: method.

I really don't know when I'm going to have time to do this (or  
anything else for that matter); I just finished a twelve-hour midterm,  
and things aren't looking like they'll improve anytime soon. I do  
welcome well-written patches from good souls, though. :)

- Andy Matuschak

On Feb 13, 2008, at 8:11 AM, Guillaume Cerquant wrote:

>
> On Feb 13, 2008, at 4:37 PM, Rob Napier wrote:
>
>> This is similar to the feature that I was talking about earlier this
>> week (forced, synchronous update on startup).
>
> I just joined the ml, and a search in the archive didn't yield
> anything useful. Sorry about any redundancy.
>
> So based on your response, I suppose this is not possible yet?
>
>> I think the underlying need is exactly "quiet mode" in which the app
>> will handle all user interaction, and Sparkle responds to app
>> requests and provides notifications, but never pops a dialog.
>
> Yes, exactly.
>
>> I'm still happy to help code over the next month or so (I have a
>> release I need to focus on this week).
>
> If I can, I would be happy too.
> I suppose that would not be a lot of extra work.
>
> Andy, could you do it between Caltech and your bed?
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
>
> -- 
> Guillaume
> _______________________________________________
> Sparkle mailing list
> Sparkle at lists.andymatuschak.org
> http://lists.andymatuschak.org/listinfo.cgi/sparkle-andymatuschak.org