[Sparkle] Sparkle timeline

[Andy Matuschak]

Heya, Pierre. I'm sorry for the confusion and the delay on actually  
finishing 1.5. You should either:
a) wait a week or two to see if anything shows up from the refactoring  
(and I'll be testing it more too)
b) use revision 146, which I'm fairly confident is stable. Or at least  
a lot more stable than 1.1.

I really, really need to figure out how to write tests for Sparkle.  
Anyone have any ideas?

- Andy Matuschak

On Apr 15, 2008, at 6:23 AM, Pierre Chatelier wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I plan to release an application that is using Sparkle. So I wonder
> what is the best option :
> -using Sparkle 1.1 that you claim being too buggy
> -using the trunk that your are currently refactoring, so there is a
> risk of a last-minute bug, and localizations are not ok
> -using a particular revision, but which one ?
> -waiting for the next stable branch (but my application is ready, so I
> do not want to wait too long)
>
> Have you got some plans for the very near future ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Pierre Chatelier
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sparkle mailing list
> Sparkle at lists.andymatuschak.org
> http://lists.andymatuschak.org/listinfo.cgi/sparkle-andymatuschak.org