[Sparkle] Inproper use of Sparkle?

[Andrew James]

I agree, i did find it funny they use Sparkle to update a Sparkle  
updater :P

PS. Is there any time frame for development of Sparkle Updater?

On 11/08/2007, at 10:40 AM, Andy Matuschak wrote:

> Nah, I don't have a problem with it at all. It's pretty rough around
> the edges, though; I think what I'm planning will give a way better
> user experience. You don't want to keep something like this running
> all the time. It should just go in the background and bug you when
> something new is available.
>
> - Andy Matuschak
>
> On Aug 10, 2007, at 5:30 PM, Andrew James wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just found this http://hohle.net/projects/perrier/ should they be
>> using Sparkles name like that?
>>
>> PS. I still think the idea of Sparkle releasing a proper one using
>> systems like Growl uses would be better then this
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sparkle mailing list
>> Sparkle at lists.andymatuschak.org
>> http://lists.andymatuschak.org/listinfo.cgi/sparkle-andymatuschak.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sparkle mailing list
> Sparkle at lists.andymatuschak.org
> http://lists.andymatuschak.org/listinfo.cgi/sparkle-andymatuschak.org