[Sparkle] Proposed solution
Steven W Riggins
mailinglists at geeksrus.com
Mon Aug 6 08:31:27 PDT 2007
On Aug 6, 2007, at 2:21 AM, Andy Matuschak wrote:
> You're absolutely right. It's not quite so bad, since it'd only be
> one time instead of once for every app, but it's disruptive, and it
> sucks. How about asking the user on the second launch? I don't
> think that'd be quite so bad. They like the app; they've come back
> to it. The first impression has already been made. This is what
> Panic does.
>
How about checking for a new version of the app. If there is none,
ask the user on QUIT. If there is a new version, ask them on
LAUNCH. That way they have a chance to get up to date.
Scenario I am thinking of:
Do a clean and install of a NEW OS on an existing machine. Run a app
I have not run in eight months. It likely has a new version to
utiliize the new OS. I'd like to know before I ran it.
Other cases, I just downloaded the latest app, I don't want to be
bugged, but when I quit, ok, cool!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.andymatuschak.org/private.cgi/sparkle-andymatuschak.org/attachments/20070806/e3644942/attachment.htm
More information about the Sparkle
mailing list